Skip to main content

Trial Attorneys Serving Florida

Josef Timlichman LawTrial Attorneys Serving Florida

Recent verdict
$47.8M won at trial
Read about the $47.8M verdict

Josef Timlichman Law represents clients across Florida in serious injury, insurance, real estate, and commercial litigation matters.

Call Josef Timlichman Law today to discuss your matter.

(305) 748-3789

100% free consultation • No attorney's fees or costs on injury cases unless we recover for you • Available 24/7

We read the fine print so you don't have to.

Cases handled by Josef Timlichman Law have received coverage from
$50M+
Won at trial and mediations/arbitration or thru trial and settlements
10+
Years of experience
24/7
Available for you

Representative Results

Representative case results

Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. The outcome of any particular case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case, including the facts, the applicable law, the venue, and the judge or jury. The results listed below are not necessarily representative of results obtained in all cases or of the experience of all clients. You should not expect the same or similar results in your case. Costs and expenses associated with each case will vary.
$47.83 Million
Jury Verdict — Real Estate Commission Dispute

In May 2026, Josef Timlichman secured a $47.83 million jury verdict in Miami-Dade County, including $19.83 million in compensatory damages and $28 million in punitive damages — believed to be the first Florida real estate broker commission case in which a court authorized punitive damages to be submitted to a jury.

Read about the $47.8M verdict
$2,000,000
Catastrophic injury — slip & fall
$1,500,000
Commercial insurance — pipe burst
$650,000
Disputed liability — left hand turn
$500,000
Car accident — rear end
$400,000
Products liability
$400,000
Hurricane damage
$350,000
Slip & fall — arbitration award
$300,000
Cruise line injury — slip & fall
$250,000
Fender bender settlement

Practice Areas

How Josef Timlichman Law can help

Josef Timlichman Law handles matters in the following practice areas:

Why Josef Timlichman Law

Why clients choose Josef Timlichman Law

Substantial experience

Josef Timlichman has obtained verdicts and settlements totaling more than $50 million for clients across Florida. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Each case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.

No attorney's fees or costs on injury cases unless we recover for you

In contingency fee matters, clients owe no attorney's fees up front. Fees and costs in contingency matters are paid from any recovery obtained.

Around the clock

Calls, texts, emails — answered fast. You'll never wonder where your case stands.

Client Stories

What Floridians say about Josef Timlichman Law

"Josef helped me in a time of crisis. He took immediate action on my case and made sure we got the settlement we deserved. It was a great experience from start to end!"
Sunny Ilyas
Google review
"Josef Timlichman law is my go to attorney. They care, they are responsive and make sure all my questions are answered. Got me a very favorable result — highly recommend."
Ariel Licht
Google review
"Since day 1 he was focused and convinced we had a case when no other attorney did. Josef, I will always be extremely thankful."
George Akram
Google review

Notable Results

Notable Results

A selection of results the firm has obtained for its clients. These are representative matters and not a complete list of the firm's wins.

Awards / Recognitions

Recognized by Super Lawyers — 2025 & 2026

Josef Timlichman was selected to the Super Lawyers list in both 2025 and 2026, an honor reserved for a small percentage of practicing attorneys.

Document excerpt: Roberts v. Carnival Corp. — U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Roberts v. Carnival Corp. — U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

The firm secured a full reversal in the Eleventh Circuit for a cruise passenger whose personal-injury claim had been dismissed based on a one-year limitations period in the carrier's ticket contract. The Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal and remanded, holding that the trial court improperly relied on documents outside the complaint and that dismissal on the ticket-contract limitations period was not proper at the pleading stage. No. 19-14993 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2020).

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Glover v. Vasallo — Florida Third District Court of Appeal

Glover v. Vasallo — Florida Third District Court of Appeal

The firm secured certiorari relief in Florida's Third District Court of Appeal after the trial court severed the client's replevin claim from his related fraud, conversion, and negligence claims. The appellate court granted the petition and quashed the severance, holding the claims were “inextricably intertwined” and that severing them departed from the essential requirements of law. 314 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020).

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Glover v. Power Yachts Int'l, LLC / Vasallo — Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County (Replevin)

Glover v. Power Yachts Int'l, LLC / Vasallo — Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County (Replevin)

The firm secured summary judgment on a replevin claim to recover a client's high-value offshore powerboat that had been sold and held by third parties who never obtained valid title. The court ordered the vessel returned to the client, title restored in the client's name, and the adverse title “stop” removed. Case No. 2019-001769-CA-01 (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir.); final order entered May 12, 2022.

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: 142 Realty, LLLP v. Juice and Java NMB, LLC — County Court, Miami-Dade County (Emergency TRO)

142 Realty, LLLP v. Juice and Java NMB, LLC — County Court, Miami-Dade County (Emergency TRO)

The firm secured an emergency temporary restraining order for a commercial landlord on a same-day filing. The court found all four injunction elements satisfied and barred the tenant from auctioning, selling, converting, or stripping chattel, fixtures, appliances, plumbing, and gas lines from the leased premises in which the landlord held a security interest and lien. Case No. 2023-028509-CC-23 (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir., Miami-Dade Cnty.); order entered April 6, 2023.

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Mitchell v. Puig — Circuit Court, Broward County (Sham Pleadings Stricken; Default Entered)

Mitchell v. Puig — Circuit Court, Broward County (Sham Pleadings Stricken; Default Entered)

The firm secured an order striking the defendants' answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim as a sham and entering default in favor of the client, a homeowner who sued the neighboring property owners for trespass and unauthorized use of his dock. After an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court found that the defendants had no knowledge of the lawsuit and never authorized the pleadings filed in their names, struck all defensive pleadings and the counterclaim, entered default on the client's claims, and granted the client's request for attorneys' fees and costs. Case No. CACE23000396 (Fla. 17th Jud. Cir., Broward Cnty.); order entered March 24, 2026.

Read the full opinion (PDF)

The results of any particular matter depend on a variety of factors unique to that case. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future case.

Don't Wait

Have a legal matter? Contact Josef Timlichman Law.

Free consultation, available 24/7. In contingency fee matters, you owe no attorney's fees or costs unless we obtain a recovery.

(305) 748-3789