Skip to main content
Josef Timlichman LawTrial Attorneys Serving Florida
Notable Results

Notable Results

A selection of results the firm has obtained for its clients. These are representative matters and not a complete list of the firm's wins.

Awards / Recognitions

Recognized by Super Lawyers — 2025 & 2026

Josef Timlichman was selected to the Super Lawyers list in both 2025 and 2026, an honor reserved for a small percentage of practicing attorneys.

Rated by Super Lawyers Rising Stars — Josef Timlichman, 2025
Rated by Super Lawyers Rising Stars — Josef Timlichman, 2026
Document excerpt: Roberts v. Carnival Corp. — U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Roberts v. Carnival Corp. — U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

The firm secured a full reversal in the Eleventh Circuit for a cruise passenger whose personal-injury claim had been dismissed based on a one-year limitations period in the carrier's ticket contract. The Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal and remanded, holding that the trial court improperly relied on documents outside the complaint and that dismissal on the ticket-contract limitations period was not proper at the pleading stage. No. 19-14993 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2020).

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Glover v. Vasallo — Florida Third District Court of Appeal

Glover v. Vasallo — Florida Third District Court of Appeal

The firm secured certiorari relief in Florida's Third District Court of Appeal after the trial court severed the client's replevin claim from his related fraud, conversion, and negligence claims. The appellate court granted the petition and quashed the severance, holding the claims were “inextricably intertwined” and that severing them departed from the essential requirements of law. 314 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020).

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Glover v. Power Yachts Int'l, LLC / Vasallo — Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County (Replevin)

Glover v. Power Yachts Int'l, LLC / Vasallo — Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County (Replevin)

The firm secured summary judgment on a replevin claim to recover a client's high-value offshore powerboat that had been sold and held by third parties who never obtained valid title. The court ordered the vessel returned to the client, title restored in the client's name, and the adverse title “stop” removed. Case No. 2019-001769-CA-01 (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir.); final order entered May 12, 2022.

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: 142 Realty, LLLP v. Juice and Java NMB, LLC — County Court, Miami-Dade County (Emergency TRO)

142 Realty, LLLP v. Juice and Java NMB, LLC — County Court, Miami-Dade County (Emergency TRO)

The firm secured an emergency temporary restraining order for a commercial landlord on a same-day filing. The court found all four injunction elements satisfied and barred the tenant from auctioning, selling, converting, or stripping chattel, fixtures, appliances, plumbing, and gas lines from the leased premises in which the landlord held a security interest and lien. Case No. 2023-028509-CC-23 (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir., Miami-Dade Cnty.); order entered April 6, 2023.

Read the full opinion (PDF)
Document excerpt: Mitchell v. Puig — Circuit Court, Broward County (Sham Pleadings Stricken; Default Entered)

Mitchell v. Puig — Circuit Court, Broward County (Sham Pleadings Stricken; Default Entered)

The firm secured an order striking the defendants' answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim as a sham and entering default in favor of the client, a homeowner who sued the neighboring property owners for trespass and unauthorized use of his dock. After an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court found that the defendants had no knowledge of the lawsuit and never authorized the pleadings filed in their names, struck all defensive pleadings and the counterclaim, entered default on the client's claims, and granted the client's request for attorneys' fees and costs. Case No. CACE23000396 (Fla. 17th Jud. Cir., Broward Cnty.); order entered March 24, 2026.

Read the full opinion (PDF)

The results of any particular matter depend on a variety of factors unique to that case. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future case.